Ryan, thank you for your voice, and your thoughtful, intelligent analysis. I see this going on not just in law firms, but in other big business, and a family member has been drastically affected by it. Your voice is important - nay, critical - right now as we are at a pivotal point in our history. Where will it end? The probabilities are horrifying...
Isn’t one purpose of a common workplace vs at home the fact that you can interact with others for synergy and brainstorming? Why Apple installs ping pong tables, etc? So if they snuck in a room and had the same convo it would be ok? But random hallway chat is forbidden?
Sounds like their reasoning is that it wasn’t billable to the client.
Ryan, thank you for your voice, and your thoughtful, intelligent analysis. I see this going on not just in law firms, but in other big business, and a family member has been drastically affected by it. Your voice is important - nay, critical - right now as we are at a pivotal point in our history. Where will it end? The probabilities are horrifying...
Case 1: Someone steps in front of Defendant's car and Defendant fails to stop in time.
Case 2: Defendant consciously decides to kill someone by running them over with their car.
Should the penalty in both cases match the identical harm done? Is it a mere abstraction to point out that one of these is murder?
I truly appreciate not just the reporting but the analysis and the theoretical discussion that followed.
I wish there more facts on this. I checked Reddit and Fishbowl and so far nothing has been posted on this development.
Isn’t one purpose of a common workplace vs at home the fact that you can interact with others for synergy and brainstorming? Why Apple installs ping pong tables, etc? So if they snuck in a room and had the same convo it would be ok? But random hallway chat is forbidden?
Sounds like their reasoning is that it wasn’t billable to the client.